Citelle

Citelle · Library

Organization names and personal authors in references

Enter personal authors and organization authors in the right name fields, and see why a mixed or empty name record is rejected.

Two kinds of author record

A person's name is entered in two parts: the family name and the given names. An organization that is credited as author, such as Example Research Group, is entered as one literal name. The four records in the table above show the difference. The personal record for Maya Stone and the organization record are both accepted. A record that holds Stone, Maya and Example Research Group at the same time is rejected as ambiguous, and so is a record with nothing in it.

The workbench does not guess which kind of name it has been given. It will not split Example Research Group into a first and last name, and it will not decide that a name on the page is the true author.

Filling an author row in the workbench

An organization author in the output

With Example Research Group as the only author of the journal-article example, the APA 7 workbench returns Example Research Group. (2024). A small study. Journal of Sample Studies, 12(2), 12–18. The name is printed whole, with no initials. In MLA output, an organization that is both the author and the journal or publisher is not repeated in the author position; the entry starts with the title instead. Names in Chinese, Japanese or Korean script are printed family name first without initials.

How the app reads names

In Citelle's Edit source screen each author row shows Last name and First name, and the row menu switches it to Organization. When the app reads names from a book record or a page's metadata, it splits a full-name string itself: the part before a comma becomes the last name, otherwise the last word does, and particles such as van, von or de stay with the last name. When a DOI record sends a personal name in capitals, such as WATSON, the app changes it to Watson, but it leaves organization names as they are. Check each split against the byline.

Keep the uncertain parts visible

Four explicit name records

ExampleSupplied recordAccepted as a name recordRetained form or reason
personal{"family":"Stone","given":"Maya"}true[{"family":"Stone","given":"Maya","literal":""}]
organization{"literal":"Example Research Group"}true[{"family":"","given":"","literal":"Example Research Group"}]
ambiguous{"family":"Stone","given":"Maya","literal":"Example Research Group"}falseambiguous_or_empty_person
empty{}falseambiguous_or_empty_person

Maya Stone and Example Research Group are invented names. Their records illustrate two distinct input forms. The record containing both literal and personal components is ambiguous and is rejected, as is an empty person record.

Tools

Library

Next guide: Chapter authors, book editors and containing titles