Apertia

Apertia · Library

How can you compare two focal lengths at matched subject framing?

Match framing by doubling focal length and distance: 50 mm at 2 m and 100 mm at 4 m both cover 1367.052 mm, with near-equal depth but twice the background blur.

What matched framing keeps and changes

In the thin-lens model, the width of a flat subject that fills the frame is the sensor width divided by the magnification v ÷ u. Doubling both the focal length and the sensor-to-subject distance keeps that magnification, so 50 mm at 2000 mm and 100 mm at 4000 mm cover the same 1367.052 mm on a 36 mm sensor.

With framing matched, Apertia's depth-of-field formula gives almost the same total interval for both setups at the same aperture. The background-blur limit, f² ÷ (N × (u − f)), does not stay the same: it roughly doubles with the longer lens. That is the measurable part of the familiar claim that a longer lens blurs the background more at equal framing.

Worked example

The first thin-lens case uses a 50 mm focal length and a 2000 mm sensor-to-subject distance.

Estimated width: 50 mm at 2000 mm (mm)
1367.051975

Worked example

Doubling both focal length and the total model distance gives the same flat-subject coverage in this ideal comparison. It does not establish an identical perspective or background appearance.

Estimated width: 100 mm at 4000 mm (mm)
1367.051975

Compare two lenses at equal framing

  1. Fix the sensor preset and the flat width the subject should fill.
  2. Set lens A and its distance; read the scene width.
  3. Multiply the focal length and the distance by the same factor for lens B.
  4. Check that both scene widths match before comparing depth of field.
  5. Compare the background-blur limit with the background set to infinity in both cases.

Worked example at f/4

50 mm at 2000 mm, f/4, full frame: near 1837.237 mm, far 2195.405 mm, total 358.168 mm; background limit 0.329 mm. 100 mm at 4000 mm, f/4: near 3830.143 mm, far 4186.076 mm, total 355.933 mm; background limit 0.658 mm. The depth differs by about 2.2 mm, while the maximum background blur doubles from 0.329 to 0.658 mm.

50 mm · 2000 mm · total depth
358.168 mm
100 mm · 4000 mm · total depth
355.933 mm
Background limit 50 mm / 100 mm
0.329 / 0.658 mm

Common mistakes

What the ideal comparison leaves out

Moving the camera changes perspective: background objects take up a different share of the frame, which no flat-subject calculation shows. Focus breathing can also alter real framing. The DOFMaster equations and Nikon's angle-of-view guide linked below cover the two parts of this comparison.

Primary sources and related work